5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 166:
Line 166: + + +
→Removal of Information
:::: OK, you're right, but the redundancy near the end is the one to remove, which I've done. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:06, 21 January 2008 (EST)
:::: OK, you're right, but the redundancy near the end is the one to remove, which I've done. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:06, 21 January 2008 (EST)
:::::Thanks. I thought it was better to remove the first paragraph, but it doesn't really matter eaither way.
:::::What about the statement "Additional anomalous results from carbon dating, which reinforce its limitations, include the inability to date carbonate rocks, which confound the science behind the dating technique"? As I mentioned in the section above, scientists ''were'' able to date carbonate rocks. This origonally had a <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag, and when I went to find a reference which shows that this statement is true, it turns out I couldn't, but I could find a reference which directly refutes it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:22, 21 January 2008 (EST)