2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + +
Talk:Douglas MacArthur (view source)
Revision as of 18:04, January 22, 2008
, 18:04, January 22, 2008no edit summary
American Occupation - not a "try" at anything. Lighten up - it was my bad. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:52, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
American Occupation - not a "try" at anything. Lighten up - it was my bad. [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:52, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
Just a thought, but isn't this a hagiography of Gen. MacArthur? While I'm not suggesting that he wasn't a good general, isn't it hyperbolic to describe him as: "one of the leading figures in military history"?
Also, seeing as WWII was presumably his finest hour, and also seeing as he's described as one of the great strategists of the conflict, there's nothing in the WWII section to back this up. I'm not denying that he was a good general - but give the reader some evidence, eh?
Oh, and why is there nothing negative here? Was he a God or a mortal?