Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
206 bytes added ,  21:51, January 22, 2008
Wikipedia minimizes Bozell's criticism.
Line 771: Line 771:     
:We may be confusing two issues here.  As mentioned above, you are not allowed to copy from Wikipedia, unless it is entirely your own work.  But you are also not allowed to use Wikipedia as a reference, which I think may be what Eoinc is referring to.  Wikipedia has a similar rule, i.e. that you cannot use other on-line encyclopedias, blogs, etc. as sources.  It has to be what they refer to as a "reliable source".  Similarly, we don't find Wikipedia necessarily reliable, so you can't use it as a source.  But as Fox said, you may be able to use and cite the same sources that Wikipedia uses.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)
 
:We may be confusing two issues here.  As mentioned above, you are not allowed to copy from Wikipedia, unless it is entirely your own work.  But you are also not allowed to use Wikipedia as a reference, which I think may be what Eoinc is referring to.  Wikipedia has a similar rule, i.e. that you cannot use other on-line encyclopedias, blogs, etc. as sources.  It has to be what they refer to as a "reliable source".  Similarly, we don't find Wikipedia necessarily reliable, so you can't use it as a source.  But as Fox said, you may be able to use and cite the same sources that Wikipedia uses.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Wikipedia minimizes Bozell's criticism.  ==
 +
 +
See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L._Brent_Bozell_III&diff=prev&oldid=157974132]. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 16:51, 22 January 2008 (EST)
439

edits

Navigation menu