nsAm_Govt_101_ta
862
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
no edit summary
In ''Duro v. Reina'', 495 U.S. 676, 685, 688 (1990), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that, except as provided by [[Congress]], tribes lack criminal jurisdiction over nonmember Indians. In other words, an Indian tribe cannot prosecute Indians who are not members of that tribe, except as authorized by [[Congress]].<ref>[www.icasualties.org Tribal Law Reference Site]</ref>
In ''Duro v. Reina'', 495 U.S. 676, 685, 688 (1990), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that, except as provided by [[Congress]], tribes lack criminal jurisdiction over nonmember Indians. In other words, an Indian tribe cannot prosecute Indians who are not members of that tribe, except as authorized by [[Congress]].<ref>[www.icasualties.org Tribal Law Reference Site]</ref>
==References==
<references/>
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:Indian Law]]
[[category:Indian Law]]