Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Craters: Two replies to MetcalfeM
Line 39: Line 39:  
You say that "Very old" is my belief yet Noahs flood is also your belief and I am not going to take one link from Creationweb about the crater that the Gulf of Mexico as a final truth. Are you suggesting that all the craters that dot the earth (aside from the Tunguska Blast of 1908)all took place in a short few hundred years during the flood and soon after?
 
You say that "Very old" is my belief yet Noahs flood is also your belief and I am not going to take one link from Creationweb about the crater that the Gulf of Mexico as a final truth. Are you suggesting that all the craters that dot the earth (aside from the Tunguska Blast of 1908)all took place in a short few hundred years during the flood and soon after?
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
 +
: Yes, Noah's flood is my belief, and I don't expect you to take any source as the final truth on anything.  (However, the reference I linked to was specifically for the information that it wasn't an impact crater, and for that they were quoting non-creationists.) Some creationists do believe that the Flood was accompanied by a meteor bombardment, so yes, I'm ''suggesting'' (not claiming) that ''most'' of the impact craters on the Earth may have been formed in that time period.
    
Have any of you YECers ever looked here?
 
Have any of you YECers ever looked here?
 
http://www.answersincreation.org/young_earth_creationist_argument_index.htm
 
http://www.answersincreation.org/young_earth_creationist_argument_index.htm
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
 +
: Yes, I've looked at the site before.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:25, 22 January 2008 (EST)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu