Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  02:31, January 23, 2008
no edit summary
Line 121: Line 121:  
sigh.....Found these showing it was not "Soft and stretchy..
 
sigh.....Found these showing it was not "Soft and stretchy..
 
I found this on National Geographic news (not a dubious creation site which your ref comes from) "First the dinosaur body had to escape predators, scavengers, and degradation by weather and water. Then a chemical process must have mineralized the tissue before bacteria ate it. And finally, the remains had to survive millions of years undamaged."  
 
I found this on National Geographic news (not a dubious creation site which your ref comes from) "First the dinosaur body had to escape predators, scavengers, and degradation by weather and water. Then a chemical process must have mineralized the tissue before bacteria ate it. And finally, the remains had to survive millions of years undamaged."  
It was not soft an stetchy. It was mineralised. And this from Sciencenews.org
+
It was not soft an stetchy. It was mineralised. And this from Washingtonpost
"It's a dinosaur that was turned into stone, essentially," said Lyson, 24, now a graduate student in paleontology at Yale University.
+
"It's a dinosaur that was turned into stone, essentially," said Lyson, 24, now a graduate student in paleontology at Yale University."
 
NOT soft and stretchy
 
NOT soft and stretchy
 
So why is this not included in the article?
 
So why is this not included in the article?
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
 
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
162

edits

Navigation menu