nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Debate:Are there any conservatives left in the Republican Party? (view source)
Revision as of 06:41, January 24, 2008
, 06:41, January 24, 2008no, I'm not a liberal parodist
::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
:::LOL. "Science behind global warming." Hehehehehe. That's a great liberal parody. You're funny. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 01:35, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::LOL. "Science behind global warming." Hehehehehe. That's a great liberal parody. You're funny. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 01:35, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:I mean the science behind the theory, or whatever it is. You know what I mean. I'm not a liberal parodist. I find that really insulting. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:41, 24 January 2008 (EST)