nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + Line 4:
Line 6: +
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 09:20, January 24, 2008
, 09:20, January 24, 2008In context...
== Recent quote ==
Oooh, can we get a quote from a scientist from some point within the last ten years? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 14:50, 23 January 2008 (EST)
Oooh, can we get a quote from a scientist from some point within the last ten years? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 14:50, 23 January 2008 (EST)
: Why? That would seem to be a rather abitrary cut-off point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:47, 23 January 2008 (EST)
: Why? That would seem to be a rather abitrary cut-off point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:47, 23 January 2008 (EST)
::: Not it wouldn't. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:47, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::: Not it wouldn't. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:47, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::: What? Yes it would. That's the definition of a cutoff point. You ignore everything past the cutoff point. I'm not suggesting we ignore everything before ten years ago, I'm just asking for a recent source so this article seems current. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 01:29, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::: What? Yes it would. That's the definition of a cutoff point. You ignore everything past the cutoff point. I'm not suggesting we ignore everything before ten years ago, I'm just asking for a recent source so this article seems current. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 01:29, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::::: Yes, a "cutoff point" means that you ignore everything past the cutoff point, but in context that means ignoring everything older than ten years ''when looking for a quote to add''. It doesn't mean deleting every quote in the article older than ten years, because that's not what you were suggesting. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:20, 24 January 2008 (EST)