852
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 411:
Line 411: + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 12:57, March 15, 2007
, 12:57, March 15, 2007→Commandment #1 needs to be clarified in the article.
I think we need to specify that verifiable means you provide a footnote. For example, I believe the a [[Scopes trial]] article is poor because it has few footnotes. I think it would force Conservapedians to do better work if "verifiable" was clarified. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:55, 14 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
I think we need to specify that verifiable means you provide a footnote. For example, I believe the a [[Scopes trial]] article is poor because it has few footnotes. I think it would force Conservapedians to do better work if "verifiable" was clarified. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:55, 14 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
:Providing a footnote isn't enough ... you can find articles that will support any topic if you search hard enough. All references should be verified and ideally backed up with other sources. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 08:57, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
== Poll on Proposed Copyright Policy ==
== Poll on Proposed Copyright Policy ==