Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 05:33, January 27, 2008

233 bytes added ,  05:33, January 27, 2008
→‎Reversion explained: reply
Line 684: Line 684:  
Don't insert [[liberal bias]] into the content page.  Please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 
Don't insert [[liberal bias]] into the content page.  Please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:09, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 
:Didn't seem terribly biased to me. After all, Conservapedia has, in the past (But fixed by yours truly) had sources posted that did nothing to confirm the relevant subject matter. Example being the [[Video games]] article, first paragraph. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 00:11, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 
:Didn't seem terribly biased to me. After all, Conservapedia has, in the past (But fixed by yours truly) had sources posted that did nothing to confirm the relevant subject matter. Example being the [[Video games]] article, first paragraph. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 00:11, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:: Mistakes are not bias.  The Wikipedia hatchet job on its entry for Conservapedia is not the result of mistakes, but of bias.  That is obvious enough, wouldn't you agree?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,426

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/381373"

Navigation menu