| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Gutenburg?==
| |
| − | Wasn't Gutenburg Catholic? --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 23:24, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Protest-ant bias==
| |
| − | This article seems to be extremely biased toward the removal of the 7 books removed by Luther.
| |
| − |
| |
| | ==Article is too brief!== | | ==Article is too brief!== |
| | This is '''The Bible!''' Don't you think the Word of God deserves a greater article, one with more detail on the subject and its history? I think so! In fact, I think I will start out by doing just that, and here's the proposed layout: | | This is '''The Bible!''' Don't you think the Word of God deserves a greater article, one with more detail on the subject and its history? I think so! In fact, I think I will start out by doing just that, and here's the proposed layout: |
| Line 88: |
Line 82: |
| | ==Pictures== | | ==Pictures== |
| | I need two more pics to illustrate this. The first is a pic of a Torah scroll, and what I want to see are people near it with reverence. The second are good copies of New Testament fragments or pages which were hand-written. And of course, they need to be in the public domain, conforming to the rules, etc... [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | | I need two more pics to illustrate this. The first is a pic of a Torah scroll, and what I want to see are people near it with reverence. The second are good copies of New Testament fragments or pages which were hand-written. And of course, they need to be in the public domain, conforming to the rules, etc... [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:50, 13 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ==As it stands now== |
| | + | Although the "History" part of it is not done at this time, the article itself should be written as a straight-up article about the Bible, with none of the allegations, questions, etc. that scholars and historians have made over the years against it. My reasons for it are two: |
| | + | *Such allegations have been proven wrong time and time again, so why even bother to repeat them here? |
| | + | *If such allegations need to be written down, then they need a separate article for each where they can be detailed as to points made, reasons why, who postulated them, and all evidence refutting them. |
| | + | [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:14, 15 March 2007 (EDT) |