1,193
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 21:58, January 28, 2008
, 21:58, January 28, 2008→Recent quote
::::::::::::: * They consider Intelligent Design to be a form of creationism, and their efforts in recent times have been more directed to that, with not so much effort directed against creationism itself.
::::::::::::: * They consider Intelligent Design to be a form of creationism, and their efforts in recent times have been more directed to that, with not so much effort directed against creationism itself.
::::::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:47, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:47, 27 January 2008 (EST)
The quotes look outdated because they're all at least a decade old-- Things easily could've changed in a decade. If memory serves, there are many lists of transitional specimens, and I can dig them up if you wish once I return home from the LAN party I'm at.
Ah, so it's conviently not a conspiracy, just... Every scientist hates magic.
For the record: Science is not decided by who can plead the most. Watch a Creation video, and you'll see what I mean.
ID '''is''' Creationism. I again reference Of Pandas And People, bearing the historic words "cdesign proponentsists." 16:58, 28 January 2008 (EST)