Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + + + +
→General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: reply re: conflict
"there are no experiments in quantum gravity, and little in the way of observations that might qualify as direct or indirect data or evidence."
"there are no experiments in quantum gravity, and little in the way of observations that might qualify as direct or indirect data or evidence."
In other words, there is no known scientific incompatibility between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:23, 29 January 2008 (EST)
In other words, there is no known scientific incompatibility between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:23, 29 January 2008 (EST)
:"There is a deep seated fundamental conflict between Quantum theory and Einstein's theory of relativity. Subtle difficulties become insurmountable problems when gravity is added." Paul Renteln, "Quantum Gravity", American Scientist, 79, 508-527 (1991). [http://home.jam.rr.com/dicksfiles/flaw/Fatalfla.htm]
:In fact, there are numerous sources on the internet that address, and agree, that there is "conflict" between "quantum mechanics" and relativity. For example, relativity denies any action-at-a-distance, while quantum mechanics depends on it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:41, 29 January 2008 (EST)