46
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + +
User talk:Hermann1359 (view source)
Revision as of 19:16, January 31, 2008
, 19:16, January 31, 2008no edit summary
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 00:20, 31 January 2008 (EST)}}
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 00:20, 31 January 2008 (EST)}}
I think what you were trying to describe would be better classified as a hallucination, not a possession. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 00:20, 31 January 2008 (EST)
I think what you were trying to describe would be better classified as a hallucination, not a possession. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 00:20, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Albert Hofmann himself clearly identified the experience as a ''demon possession''. This is not unprecedented. It is described in the Bible several times.[[User:Hermann1359|Hermann1359]] 00:26, 31 January 2008 (EST)
:Albert Hofmann himself clearly identified the experience as a ''demon possession''. This is not unprecedented. It is described in the Bible several times.[[User:Hermann1359|Hermann1359]] 00:26, 31 January 2008 (EST)
::Upon re-reading it, it sounds like he was using the demon as a metaphor for LSD. If that's not the case, any "demons" were likely to be hallucinations caused by the drug. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 14:16, 31 January 2008 (EST)