Changes

I just reverted two paragraphs to an earlier version.  Feebasfactor had edited the two paragraphs, and in so doing incorrectly claimed that the problem that YECs have with radiometric dating is the size of the margin of error.  This is not the issue.  He also changed "Young-Earth creationists therefore claim ..." to "However, [[young earth creationist]]s claim...".  This was fair enough, as the sentence did not logically flow from the previous sentence.  However, this was because of a previous edit[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Radiometric_dating&diff=next&oldid=213492] that changed the flow of the previous sentence, and which introduced a contrary thought which was unsupported by a valid reference.  It had been there plenty long enough for a reference, but none was forthcoming, so I've reverted those paragraphs to prior to that edit, with the result that the "Young-Earth creationists therefore claim ..." is again valid, and the incorrect claim about the size of the margin of error is gone.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:59, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I just reverted two paragraphs to an earlier version.  Feebasfactor had edited the two paragraphs, and in so doing incorrectly claimed that the problem that YECs have with radiometric dating is the size of the margin of error.  This is not the issue.  He also changed "Young-Earth creationists therefore claim ..." to "However, [[young earth creationist]]s claim...".  This was fair enough, as the sentence did not logically flow from the previous sentence.  However, this was because of a previous edit[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Radiometric_dating&diff=next&oldid=213492] that changed the flow of the previous sentence, and which introduced a contrary thought which was unsupported by a valid reference.  It had been there plenty long enough for a reference, but none was forthcoming, so I've reverted those paragraphs to prior to that edit, with the result that the "Young-Earth creationists therefore claim ..." is again valid, and the incorrect claim about the size of the margin of error is gone.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:59, 31 January 2008 (EST)