SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 180:
Line 180: + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Iduan/Archive6 (view source)
Revision as of 00:44, February 1, 2008
, 00:44, February 1, 2008archive
Good work! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 16:57, 26 January 2008 (EST)
Good work! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 16:57, 26 January 2008 (EST)
:Haha thanks - though you and Dan were the one's that actually got the work done!--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:00, 26 January 2008 (EST)
:Haha thanks - though you and Dan were the one's that actually got the work done!--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:00, 26 January 2008 (EST)
== Goodbye Iduan :-( ==
You'll be missed. I hope you might come back here after a while; you were a very hard worker and a very, very nice guy. See you soon, -[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 11:33, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:Iduan, I'm so sorry to see you go. I can appreciate your frustration as I have also been a sysop candidate for a long time and am still waiting for my contributions to be recognized. However, I still believe Mr. Aschlafly when he says that Conservapedia is a meritocracy and hope that my contributions will ultimately be recognized despite what I know others to have said behind my back. I too have tried to improve Conservapedia both in content as well as quality and appearance but have been disappointed by being unable to accomplish certain tasks without having to jump through hoops. As the site owner, the future of Conservapedia lies in the hands of Mr. Aschlafly. As a true conservative and he is a man of his word, so I am convinced he will shortly promote one or two editors of proven longstanding just as he has promised us all over the past six months. To do otherwise would be tantamount to taxation without representation, a liberal position that would never be promulgated here. I encourage you to stay and persevere as your contributions have been incredibly valuable to the overall standing of Conservapedia. I intend to continue here for a while longer hoping for a sign of recognition and encourage you to join me in doing the same. Conservapedia is a trustworthy encyclopedia and I have faith that the trust is a two-way thing. God bless you whatever you choose. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:11, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::To be fair, though, Iduan can not even get ''edit'' rights, while others (who have done significantly less work) ''have'' been given them (not to mention the two-entry sysop). I asked for edit rights and Andy couldn't even give me a believable answer. Is it really credible to say that if Iduan holds on longer he will be made sysop? Iduan (and my) grief isn't that he is being denied rights, but that he is given no reason for such. A simple "you are too liberal" or "you need to make X number of edits" or anything that's actually verifiable is much better than being ignored or hand-waved to. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:01, 27 January 2008 (EST)
== Come back ==
This is not the way to go. Your work has been appreciated and useful. You don't need more to be excellent as you have been. So, come back and be proud of your work with the silent applause of many. See the example of Learn together and others. This project is not of speed but of resistance. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:15, 27 January 2008 (EST)