Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
more
Line 44: Line 44:     
:: That's an interesting suggestion!  I like it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:37, 3 February 2008 (EST)
 
:: That's an interesting suggestion!  I like it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:37, 3 February 2008 (EST)
−
 
+
==Points==
 
===New entry===
 
===New entry===
 
<u>Quality</u> new entry: '''20 points'''
 
<u>Quality</u> new entry: '''20 points'''
Line 61: Line 61:  
*''Definition'': A entry copied from a public domain source such as .gov site - you MUST link to other articles and the article can not be of trivial nature (i.e. non-encyclopedic, non-educational or non-historical)
 
*''Definition'': A entry copied from a public domain source such as .gov site - you MUST link to other articles and the article can not be of trivial nature (i.e. non-encyclopedic, non-educational or non-historical)
    +
<u>Masterpiece</u>: '''100 points'''
 +
*''Definition'': At the end of the contest each user (if they want to) will nominate their best article, and then the judges will pick the top two of all the articles nominated. The winning users will get 100 points for their article.
 
===Existing entry===
 
===Existing entry===
 
<u>Quality edit</u> of an existing entry: '''8 points'''
 
<u>Quality edit</u> of an existing entry: '''8 points'''
Line 97: Line 99:  
*''Exception'': Full credit will be given for notable or important historical subjects, and for political entries.
 
*''Exception'': Full credit will be given for notable or important historical subjects, and for political entries.
 
*''Exception'': Full credit will be given for reasonable subjects which are educational but not necessarily taught in a typical school.
 
*''Exception'': Full credit will be given for reasonable subjects which are educational but not necessarily taught in a typical school.
 +
*''Exception'': If entertainment entries are excessively useless - judges can deduct points
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu