1,193
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 124:
Line 124: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 01:55, February 4, 2008
, 01:55, February 4, 2008no edit summary
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:47, 3 February 2008 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:47, 3 February 2008 (EST)
:Ah, thanks. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, then.
:Withdrawing the comment serves no purpose.
:Yeah, I should add references... To be honest, I'm not sure what exactly I was referring to either. I'm sorry.
:"I ''reject'' such claims as unsubstantiated." And here's the problem. You lay down a blanket statement rejecting all claims of transitional fossils as unsubstantiated. If I'm interpreting that correctly, there is no point in continuing this discussion.
:So any list of transitional fossils is mere circular reasoning?
:No, what you're doing is horribly misunderstanding how trees grow. You could easily argue that every theory is "Storytelling", by that logic.
:You don't believe that the evolutionary paths of each creature are not fully understood yet happened? Uhh... mate, that doesn't make a lick of sense. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:55, 3 February 2008 (EST)
== Picture ==
== Picture ==