10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: +
Talk:Cdesign proponentsists (view source)
Revision as of 04:42, February 5, 2008
, 04:42, February 5, 2008no edit summary
::There's a misspelling in the graph they use. I know it's an ad hominem argument, but shouldn't they proofread a little better if they are themselves trying to use a proofreading error as proof of something? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:38, 4 February 2008 (EST)
::There's a misspelling in the graph they use. I know it's an ad hominem argument, but shouldn't they proofread a little better if they are themselves trying to use a proofreading error as proof of something? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:38, 4 February 2008 (EST)
:::Ouch. Ad hom. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:39, 4 February 2008 (EST)
:::Ouch. Ad hom. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:39, 4 February 2008 (EST)
::::Oh, I'm sorry, I'll look for a better source. The NOVA documentary "Intelligent Design on Trial" covers all the information in much more detail but I am unsure how to reference a video. Also, it's not a typo, it was left without a suffix to include creationism and creationist and other variants.--[[User:Gman2|Gman2]] 23:42, 4 February 2008 (EST)