1,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: + + + +
Talk:Scientific Revolution (view source)
Revision as of 20:30, February 6, 2008
, 20:30, February 6, 2008Content
He admits that the Copernican theory was less accurate than the Ptolemaic, but insists on saying that the Copernican was a scientific revolution as defined by accounting for more observations. But it is just not true that the Copernican accounted for more observations. He inserts his own explanations of why the Copernican was less accurate, but they just aren't relevant. He deletes comments about the scientific nature of Copernicus's work. He also distorts Kuhn's definition of a revolution. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:18, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
He admits that the Copernican theory was less accurate than the Ptolemaic, but insists on saying that the Copernican was a scientific revolution as defined by accounting for more observations. But it is just not true that the Copernican accounted for more observations. He inserts his own explanations of why the Copernican was less accurate, but they just aren't relevant. He deletes comments about the scientific nature of Copernicus's work. He also distorts Kuhn's definition of a revolution. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:18, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
== Content ==
Alright, I've begun to include some good old-fashioned unbiased content to this article, so interested folks can actually see what history people are talking when they say "scientific revolution."