| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics: | | The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics: |
| | | | |
| | + | #insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate, or [[last wordism]] |
| | #attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks | | #attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks |
| | #calling others "extremist" | | #calling others "extremist" |
| − | #deny the obvious and embrace the implausible | + | #deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of [[liberal denial]] |
| | #attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true | | #attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true |
| | #attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true | | #attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true |
| | #overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] | | #overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] |
| | #unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement | | #unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement |
| − | #calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref>
| |
| − | #denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]]
| |
| | #denial of accountability | | #denial of accountability |
| | + | #believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office |
| | #insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!" | | #insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!" |
| | #concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them | | #concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| | #resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]] | | #resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]] |
| | #preference for obscenity and profanity <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref> | | #preference for obscenity and profanity <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref> |
| − | #insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate
| |
| | #over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT) | | #over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT) |
| | [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT) | | [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT) |
| Line 45: |
Line 44: |
| | #using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]]. But their example does not help their argument. Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism). Think about that. | | #using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]]. But their example does not help their argument. Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism). Think about that. |
| | #selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain. | | #selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain. |
| − | #believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements.
| |
| | #silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref> | | #silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref> |
| | #can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]). | | #can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]). |
| Line 51: |
Line 49: |
| | #"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}} | | #"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}} |
| | #Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence. | | #Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence. |
| | + | #calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref> |
| | + | #denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]] |
| | | | |
| | ==References== | | ==References== |