Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
some prioritizing; more welcome
Line 3: Line 3:  
The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics:
 
The style of a [[liberal]] often includes these characteristics:
    +
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate, or [[last wordism]]
 
#attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks
 
#attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring, and bait them into making insensitive remarks
 
#calling others "extremist"
 
#calling others "extremist"
−
#deny the obvious and embrace the implausible
+
#deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of [[liberal denial]]
 
#attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true
 
#overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]]
 
#overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]]
 
#unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement
 
#unjustified praise of [[atheists]] and other [[liberals]] as "geniuses", despite little achievement
−
#calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref>
  −
#denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]]
   
#denial of accountability
 
#denial of accountability
 +
#believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office
 
#insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!"
 
#insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!"
 
#concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them
 
#concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them
Line 20: Line 20:  
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
−
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate
   
#over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)  
 
#over-reliance on [[mockery]] <ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[User:Graham|Graham]] 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)  
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298334&oldid=298314#Burma]</ref> <ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
Line 45: Line 44:  
#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
 
#selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain.
 
#selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain.
−
#believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements.
   
#silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref>
 
#silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref>
 
#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).
 
#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).
Line 51: Line 49:  
#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}}
 
#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}}
 
#Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.
 
#Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.
 +
#calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref>
 +
#denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]]
    
==References==
 
==References==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,365

edits

Navigation menu