nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
User talk:CarolineMilton (view source)
Revision as of 05:49, February 8, 2008
, 05:49, February 8, 2008→What you saw: Sorry, that explanation doesn't work
::''Or'' it could be that the image was named '''dino''' art... --[[User:David R|<font color="#0092FF">David R</font>]][[User talk:David R|<sup><font color="#FFCC00">talk</font></sup>]] 00:17, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::''Or'' it could be that the image was named '''dino''' art... --[[User:David R|<font color="#0092FF">David R</font>]][[User talk:David R|<sup><font color="#FFCC00">talk</font></sup>]] 00:17, 8 February 2008 (EST)
:: It's not like an ink blot test, and the scientist who found it most definitely did ''not'' see what he wanted to see, as he didn't believe in dinosaurs and men living together, yet recognised it as a dinosaur[http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving]. Rather, people tend to excuse and dismiss what they don't want to believe. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:49, 8 February 2008 (EST)