Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
177 bytes added ,  20:39, February 8, 2008
shocking, I know
Line 6: Line 6:     
You're just replacing their genius bias with your own.  Richard Dawkins has been a leader in the field of biology for over 30 years, since ''The Selfish Gene'' was published  I can't find more than a couple publications by Jonathan Wells.  You're trying to replace someone with decades of respected scholarship who happens to believe differently from you with someone with practically no academic notoriety who happens to agree with you.  I don't know why you think that fighting bias with blatant bias is going to solve anything.  I think liberal bias is bad enough, but you can't fight fire with flamethrowers. [[User:RWest|RWest]] 13:42, 8 February 2008 (EST)
 
You're just replacing their genius bias with your own.  Richard Dawkins has been a leader in the field of biology for over 30 years, since ''The Selfish Gene'' was published  I can't find more than a couple publications by Jonathan Wells.  You're trying to replace someone with decades of respected scholarship who happens to believe differently from you with someone with practically no academic notoriety who happens to agree with you.  I don't know why you think that fighting bias with blatant bias is going to solve anything.  I think liberal bias is bad enough, but you can't fight fire with flamethrowers. [[User:RWest|RWest]] 13:42, 8 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:But didn't you know? [[Richard Dawkins]] is [[Richard_Dawkins#Position_at_Oxford| not even a real professor!]] [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:39, 8 February 2008 (EST)
    
== New bias? ==
 
== New bias? ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902

edits

Navigation menu