nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: +
User talk:CarolineMilton (view source)
Revision as of 20:03, February 11, 2008
, 20:03, February 11, 2008→What you saw: When dinos went extinct
::Alright...*Reword*: ''Most'' dinosaurs went extinct a few thousand years ago! :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 10:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)
::Alright...*Reword*: ''Most'' dinosaurs went extinct a few thousand years ago! :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 10:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)
::: I'm not sure what your point is. In the context of whether or not the painting could be of a dinosaur, your original comment could be read as saying that it couldn't be a dinosaur because they weren't around. You now seem to be admitting that at least ''some'' dinosaurs were around more recently, which would negate that reason for thinking that the painting couldn't be of a dinosaur. In any case, I don't believe that we have good information on exactly when each type went extinct, but there ''in'' good information on at least some types being around much more recently than a few thousand years ago. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 15:03, 11 February 2008 (EST)
==Careful==
==Careful==
[[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandment #7]] can be a doozy. But a few non-controversial contributions show you're not just here to chat. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 20:43, 10 February 2008 (EST)
[[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandment #7]] can be a doozy. But a few non-controversial contributions show you're not just here to chat. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 20:43, 10 February 2008 (EST)