Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
:The question is not the matter whether it is a liberal or conservative issue. The problem with this page is that it does not have a drop of encyclopedic content. It has no sources/references to an form of official creed. It is based on mere speculation by the author. This article has no basis, lacking even a basic statistical source. [[User:Kiss20|Kiss20]] 19:44, 11, February 2008 (EST)
 
:The question is not the matter whether it is a liberal or conservative issue. The problem with this page is that it does not have a drop of encyclopedic content. It has no sources/references to an form of official creed. It is based on mere speculation by the author. This article has no basis, lacking even a basic statistical source. [[User:Kiss20|Kiss20]] 19:44, 11, February 2008 (EST)
 
::Read above. Anyone criticizing this article's encyclopedic value has a [[liberal heart]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:04, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 
::Read above. Anyone criticizing this article's encyclopedic value has a [[liberal heart]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:04, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::That or, just throwing this out there, they actually know what qualification as "encyclopedic" means? Encyclopedic is itself based on verifiable fact. [[User:Kiss20|Kiss20]] 22:07, 11 February 2008 (EST)
    
==Revert==
 
==Revert==
58

edits

Navigation menu