Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
Political opponents of ID generally brand it as "Creationism"
Departing from their self-imposed realm of [[physical science]], some evolutionists have raised theological objections to intelligent design. One of the most common arguments is an atheistic one; that if an [[Intelligent Designer]] created life in all its forms, such a designer would also have to have a creator, leading to an [[infinite regress]]. (See [[Arguments for atheism]].)
Departing from their self-imposed realm of [[physical science]], some evolutionists have raised theological objections to intelligent design. One of the most common arguments is an atheistic one; that if an [[Intelligent Designer]] created life in all its forms, such a designer would also have to have a creator, leading to an [[infinite regress]]. (See [[Arguments for atheism]].)
Political opponents of ID generally brand it as "[[Creationism]]", so as to make it off limits for discussion in [[public school]] science classes.
Design theory leaves the identity of the Intelligent Designer open; it seeks instead to develop a reliable methodology for characterizing when a material/energy configuration is best explained by reference to more than strictly unguided natural processes, the identity of the designer being left to follow-on forensic investigative initiatives.
Design theory leaves the identity of the Intelligent Designer open; it seeks instead to develop a reliable methodology for characterizing when a material/energy configuration is best explained by reference to more than strictly unguided natural processes, the identity of the designer being left to follow-on forensic investigative initiatives.