127
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + +
No coverage of those who don't marry?
==Attacks on the institution of marriage==
==Attacks on the institution of marriage==
Just wanted to note here a deeply touching explanation by the Republican mayor of San Diego for his recent change of heart over the issue of gay marriage. I realise that 'evolution' is a dirty word on this website for many people, but IMHO this man is an example of how views on the issue of gay marriage are changing. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SnTwrnKb61Q%20--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 11:09, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Just wanted to note here a deeply touching explanation by the Republican mayor of San Diego for his recent change of heart over the issue of gay marriage. I realise that 'evolution' is a dirty word on this website for many people, but IMHO this man is an example of how views on the issue of gay marriage are changing. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SnTwrnKb61Q%20--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 11:09, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
== No coverage of those who don't marry? ==
This article doesn't say anything about those who are single and not in a relationship. How come the article doesn't say anything about the proper age to be married? (I.e. being unmarried at 18 is normal, being unmarried by 25 is a 50-50 choice, being unmarried by 30 means you need to settle down, and being unmarried by 40 means you're a complete loser with no social skills.) Being unmarried by a certain age erodes the institution of marriage just as much as being homosexual or cohabitating without being married. There should be some coverage of this. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 10:58, 14 February 2008 (EST)