Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
25 bytes added ,  07:51, February 15, 2008
please begin new discussions at the end of the page
Line 49: Line 49:     
== Politicization ==
 
== Politicization ==
The sentence at the beginning of the article, saying that liberals engage in deceit but not mentioning conservatives, implies that only liberals deceive.  This is clearly absurd, and the "references" seem to be opinion pieces by conservatives.  I am new to this website, but I don't see how this article can possibly be useful... isn't this saying that conservatives never deceive, which is clearly not true?  I edited this, but someone changed it back without replying to what I said when I changed it.--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:18, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  −
:Don't remove sections of this article because you disagree with them. Remember, this is a conservative site and you're not allowed to change it to a NPOV. This is not Wikipedia. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 02:26, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  −
::I'm sorry, as I said, I am new.  I thought people were supposed to edit in factual information from a conservative viewpoint, which makes sense to me.  But you didn't address what I said... do you think the assertion in the article is true, that only liberals deceive?  I am a conservative, and I am not perfect... I am sure I have deceived someone at some point.  Haven't you?  This article doesn't seem informative really, but more like just an attack.  Am I misunderstanding something?--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:31, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  −
:::This article is not about me or other conservatives. This article is about liberals who deceive and the examples are very informative. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 02:38, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  −
::::I would understand that, but it's just called "deceit", not "liberal deceit", right?  Is there some portion of the code or something that I screwed up?  It looks like it's just "deceit."--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:45, 15 February 2008 (EST)
  −
   
So, regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deceit&diff=181455&oldid=181449 this] edit war, the two sentences seem to suggest two things:
 
So, regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deceit&diff=181455&oldid=181449 this] edit war, the two sentences seem to suggest two things:
 
# They suggest that all Conservatives are not deceitful, and that all Liberals are deceitful. That is a perfect definition of [[stereotype]], and I'm sure we can agree that stereotypes suck.
 
# They suggest that all Conservatives are not deceitful, and that all Liberals are deceitful. That is a perfect definition of [[stereotype]], and I'm sure we can agree that stereotypes suck.
Line 453: Line 447:     
:OK then. Can you please explain to me the logical basis for your entry in this article? Why have you not included isolated examples of conservative deceit also? Its anti-Academic to do what you have done. 'Typical Liberal Style' - Why don't you grow up. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 10:15, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
:OK then. Can you please explain to me the logical basis for your entry in this article? Why have you not included isolated examples of conservative deceit also? Its anti-Academic to do what you have done. 'Typical Liberal Style' - Why don't you grow up. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 10:15, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
==Liberals and Deceit==
 +
 +
The sentence at the beginning of the article, saying that liberals engage in deceit but not mentioning conservatives, implies that only liberals deceive.  This is clearly absurd, and the "references" seem to be opinion pieces by conservatives.  I am new to this website, but I don't see how this article can possibly be useful... isn't this saying that conservatives never deceive, which is clearly not true?  I edited this, but someone changed it back without replying to what I said when I changed it.--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:18, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
:Don't remove sections of this article because you disagree with them. Remember, this is a conservative site and you're not allowed to change it to a NPOV. This is not Wikipedia. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 02:26, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::I'm sorry, as I said, I am new.  I thought people were supposed to edit in factual information from a conservative viewpoint, which makes sense to me.  But you didn't address what I said... do you think the assertion in the article is true, that only liberals deceive?  I am a conservative, and I am not perfect... I am sure I have deceived someone at some point.  Haven't you?  This article doesn't seem informative really, but more like just an attack.  Am I misunderstanding something?--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:31, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
:::This article is not about me or other conservatives. This article is about liberals who deceive and the examples are very informative. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 02:38, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::::I would understand that, but it's just called "deceit", not "liberal deceit", right?  Is there some portion of the code or something that I screwed up?  It looks like it's just "deceit."--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:45, 15 February 2008 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902

edits

Navigation menu