Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − Some of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message<ref name="nyt"/> (see [[deceit]]).+
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 18:51, February 15, 2008
, 18:51, February 15, 2008In a stunning example of deceit, it turns out the 2 of the 3 scientists who complained, said they would have done the interviews anyway
==Backlash==
==Backlash==
One of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claimed that he was deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message<ref name="nyt"/> The other two scientists said they would have given on-screen interviews anyway.
== See also ==
== See also ==