Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Including Criticism: Thanks Ed, sorry for the mistake!
Line 6: Line 6:     
:See [[strawman fallacy]]. I don't know that the film portrays intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory to evolution. According to what I've read so far, it portrays the establishment as '''suppressing''' discussion of whether there can '''be''' any such alternatives. Do you see the difference? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:59, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
:See [[strawman fallacy]]. I don't know that the film portrays intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory to evolution. According to what I've read so far, it portrays the establishment as '''suppressing''' discussion of whether there can '''be''' any such alternatives. Do you see the difference? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:59, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::Oops.  You're right; that doesn't bear on the movie, it bears on the theory.  Good call on removing it, sorry.  Thank you!-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 14:01, 15 February 2008 (EST)
nsAm_Govt_101_ta
862

edits

Navigation menu