nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: − One of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claimed that he was deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message<ref name="nyt"/> The other two scientists said they would have given on-screen interviews anyway.+
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 00:01, February 16, 2008
, 00:01, February 16, 2008→Backlash: The previous version was a bit garbled, and Dawkins didn't refer to ID
==Backlash==
==Backlash==
Three of the scientists interviewed in the film claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and one, [[Richard Dawkins]] said that he would not have agreed to participate in it had he known the stand that it was going to take, which he deceptively describes as "creationist". The other two said that they would have appeared anyway.<ref name="nyt"/>
== See also ==
== See also ==