Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
What happened here...
Line 2: Line 2:     
# Refusing to allow articles on terms which describe the manipulative tactics that liberals use such as [[Liberal obfuscation]], and smearing efforts to add them as vandalism<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Liberal+obfuscation http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Liberal+obfuscation]</ref> (itself an example of obfuscation), all whilst allowing entries on trivial and meaningless terms that were spawned by television shows<ref>[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'oh Such as the entry on D'oh]
 
# Refusing to allow articles on terms which describe the manipulative tactics that liberals use such as [[Liberal obfuscation]], and smearing efforts to add them as vandalism<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Liberal+obfuscation http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Liberal+obfuscation]</ref> (itself an example of obfuscation), all whilst allowing entries on trivial and meaningless terms that were spawned by television shows<ref>[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'oh Such as the entry on D'oh]
 +
 
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[conservative]] [[Ron Paul]] smears him with unsubstantiated statements (newsletter "issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&oldid=183792833</ref>), misleading attributions of statements (Paul renounced the statements in 2001), and an overall political hatchet job ... and then locks the page to prevent correction!<ref>The page was locked January 9th and remained locked indefinitely. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&action=history]</ref>
 
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[conservative]] [[Ron Paul]] smears him with unsubstantiated statements (newsletter "issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&oldid=183792833</ref>), misleading attributions of statements (Paul renounced the statements in 2001), and an overall political hatchet job ... and then locks the page to prevent correction!<ref>The page was locked January 9th and remained locked indefinitely. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&action=history]</ref>
 +
 
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Benazir Bhutto]] has nearly 8,000 words on all aspects of her life, and yet not one word acknowledging that she was [[pro-life]] and led the movement against the [[United Nations]]' creating a new international right to [[abortion]].<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto</ref>
 
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Benazir Bhutto]] has nearly 8,000 words on all aspects of her life, and yet not one word acknowledging that she was [[pro-life]] and led the movement against the [[United Nations]]' creating a new international right to [[abortion]].<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto</ref>
 
# Type in "[[conservative]]" on [[Wikipedia]] and you will be redirected to over 4500 words of confusion without any mention of [[marriage]], gun rights or personal accountability.  [[Wikipedia]] even claims that [[conservatives]] opposed to [[abortion]] are described as "anti-baby" or "anti-family".  [[Wikipedia]] removed this bias only after it was identified here.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism&diff=next&oldid=179870132</ref>
 
# Type in "[[conservative]]" on [[Wikipedia]] and you will be redirected to over 4500 words of confusion without any mention of [[marriage]], gun rights or personal accountability.  [[Wikipedia]] even claims that [[conservatives]] opposed to [[abortion]] are described as "anti-baby" or "anti-family".  [[Wikipedia]] removed this bias only after it was identified here.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism&diff=next&oldid=179870132</ref>
273

edits

Navigation menu