Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:  
== Withdrawal of Jurisdiction over Constitutional Challenges ==
 
== Withdrawal of Jurisdiction over Constitutional Challenges ==
   −
Some have questioned whether [[Congress]] may withdraw jurisdiction completely from courts over constitutional issues.  Studies of this issue have been inconclusive due to the lack of precedents precisely on point.<ref>http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-8144:1</ref>  But there is no reason to expect limitations on this power of [[Congress]].
+
Some have questioned whether [[Congress]] may withdraw jurisdiction completely from courts over constitutional issues.  Studies of this issue have been inconclusive due to the lack of precedents precisely on point.<ref>http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-8144:1</ref>  But there is no reason to expect limitations on this power of [[Congress]]. Indeed, many withdrawals of jurisdiction implicitly include constitutional challenges.
−
 
  −
A safer approach is to withdraw pre-enforcement challenges to statutes, which would work regardless of constitutionality.
      +
A more established approach is to withdraw pre-enforcement challenges to statutes, which would work regardless of constitutionality.
    
== Other Withdrawals of Jurisdiction ==
 
== Other Withdrawals of Jurisdiction ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,425

edits

Navigation menu