Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Workings: special points for top-ranking entries and Conservapedia terms
Line 2: Line 2:  
==Workings==
 
==Workings==
   −
This contest is different from past contests.  It will focus on insights and quality, not quantity.  The point system (see below) has been adjusted accordingly.
+
This contest focuses on insights and quality, not quantity.  The point system (see below) has been adjusted accordingly.
   −
The format is also different.  Like many sports contests, one side "kicks off" by putting starting an entry.  The other side must then work with that entry, by improving it and adding links.  The first team then must work within those links, and so on until time elapses.
+
Like many sports contests, one side "kicks off" by putting starting an entry.  The other side must then work with that entry, by improving it and adding links.  The first team then must work within those links, and so on until time elapses.  One team cannot intentionally fill in a link created by itself: it must try to fill in links created by the other team.  (Inadvertent mistakes about who created the link will still count towards points.)
 +
 
 +
Special points are awarded to quality improvements to Conservapedia entries that rank high in search engines, such as traditional Conservapedia features like [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] or [[faith]] or [[liberal]], as well as the [[Conservapedia terms]].
    
===Those Interested In Participating Please Put Your Name Here===
 
===Those Interested In Participating Please Put Your Name Here===
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu