Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 83: Line 83:  
::::That wasn't irrelevant at all. Correlation != causation. --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 16:08, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::That wasn't irrelevant at all. Correlation != causation. --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 16:08, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::Sorry, my edit summary should have been "basic statistical interpretation". --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 16:09, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::Sorry, my edit summary should have been "basic statistical interpretation". --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 16:09, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::::: Why did you cite your counterexample, if it wasn't an example of the logical fallacy #2 in [[liberal logic]]?  Do you really think a counterexample disproves causation?
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu