Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart (view source)
Revision as of 03:17, February 20, 2008
, 03:17, February 20, 2008New page: In ''Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart'', 467 U.S. 20 (1984), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that there is no First Amendment right to disseminate, in advance of trial, infor...
In ''Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart'', 467 U.S. 20 (1984), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] unanimously held that there is no [[First Amendment]] right to disseminate, in advance of trial, information gained through the pretrial discovery process.
Justice [[Lewis Powell] wrote the decision for the Court. Justice [[William Brennan]] concurred, and was joined by Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]].
This decision has been frequently criticized or distinguished. Note also the limited scope of this decision. Information that one "lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance" is protected by the [[First Amendment]], and "state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order." ''Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.'', 443 U.S. 97, 103 (1979); ''Florida Star v. B. J. F.'', 491 U.S. 524, 533 (1989).
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:First Amendment]]
Justice [[Lewis Powell] wrote the decision for the Court. Justice [[William Brennan]] concurred, and was joined by Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]].
This decision has been frequently criticized or distinguished. Note also the limited scope of this decision. Information that one "lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance" is protected by the [[First Amendment]], and "state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order." ''Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.'', 443 U.S. 97, 103 (1979); ''Florida Star v. B. J. F.'', 491 U.S. 524, 533 (1989).
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:First Amendment]]