Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
170 bytes added ,  01:36, February 21, 2008
ruling about discovery
Line 8: Line 8:     
:"At such time as a majority of the Court is willing to reexamine our holding in ''[[Butz v. Economou]]'', 438 U.S. 478 (1978), I shall join in that undertaking with alacrity. But until that time comes, I agree that the Court's opinion in this case properly disposes of the issues presented, and I therefore join it.
 
:"At such time as a majority of the Court is willing to reexamine our holding in ''[[Butz v. Economou]]'', 438 U.S. 478 (1978), I shall join in that undertaking with alacrity. But until that time comes, I agree that the Court's opinion in this case properly disposes of the issues presented, and I therefore join it.
 +
 +
The Court also ruled that:
 +
 +
:"Until this threshold immunity question is resolved, discovery should not be allowed."
 +
 +
''Harlow v. Fitzgerald'', 457 U.S. 800, 817 (1982).
    
There was only one dissent, by [[Chief Justice]] [[Warren Burger]].
 
There was only one dissent, by [[Chief Justice]] [[Warren Burger]].
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits

Navigation menu