Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − +
→Semantic apologetics
== Semantic apologetics ==
== Semantic apologetics ==
Semantic apologetics supports strong atheism with arguments that criticize as meaningless the words used to describe God.
Semantic apologetics regarding strong atheism criticize as meaningless the words used to describe God.
For example, a strong atheist might criticize the assertion "God transcends space and time" by asking what exactly the believer means by saying that. If the believer is unable to explain what he means, the strong atheist would conclude "You don't know what you are talking about; therefore your statement carries no meaning; therefore you are not justified in believing it."
For example, a strong atheist might criticize the assertion "God transcends space and time" by asking what exactly the believer means by saying that. If the believer is unable to explain what he means, the strong atheist would conclude "You don't know what you are talking about; therefore your statement carries no meaning; therefore you are not justified in believing it."