Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
355 bytes added ,  11:37, February 23, 2008
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Sorry, but as a bit of a grammar geek, I couldn't let this pass without comment. To claim that it is a result of feminism is simply silly and detracts from what is supposed to be an encyclopedia.--[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:25, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 
Sorry, but as a bit of a grammar geek, I couldn't let this pass without comment. To claim that it is a result of feminism is simply silly and detracts from what is supposed to be an encyclopedia.--[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:25, 23 February 2008 (EST)
   −
Sigh. Fair enough. You want to pretend that it is all the fault of liberals and feminists, despite it dating back centuries. If you want to look silly, then that is fine. I won't bother with this article again and will leave it looking ridiculous.--[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)
+
Sigh. Fair enough. You want to pretend that it is all the fault of liberals and feminists, despite it dating back centuries. If you want to look silly, then that is fine. I won't bother with this article again and will leave it looking ridiculous.--[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:30, 23 February 2008 (EST) Meanwhile, maybe someone should look at this site: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/they or this one, http://englishbibles.blogspot.com/2006/09/singular-they-in-english-bibles.html if you want to continue pretending that the KJV Bible is feminist or liberal then there is little hope left --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:37, 23 February 2008 (EST)
110

edits

Navigation menu