nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + + + + +
That reply didn't help your case.
:: Sure, you would prefer to have an incorrect claim in an "encyclopedia" because it is all about the liberals and the feminists. That is your choice. I won't correct this article any further. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:51, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:: Sure, you would prefer to have an incorrect claim in an "encyclopedia" because it is all about the liberals and the feminists. That is your choice. I won't correct this article any further. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 06:51, 23 February 2008 (EST)
::: KimSell, your reply has not helped your case.
:::* No, I did not revert it ''because'' I didn't understand it. It was the ''combination'' of the points above, not just one by itself, that caused me to revert it.
:::* It might have showed that a word can have more than one meaning, but that was not my point. My point was that the article didn't flow well.
:::* You not being aware of any evidence for the view that the article expressed does not mean that there ''is'' no evidence.
::: And no, I would ''not'' prefer to have an incorrect claim. If you decline to edit the article further despite my implicit invitation to do so, then that is ''your'' choice.
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:18, 23 February 2008 (EST)