nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: +
Yeah, okay, but...
:: Oh. I am sorry. I did not realise that what you wanted was a lot of unsupported claims about liberals and feminists, as opposed to the actual reference I gave to the historical usage of the word. I will try to be more conservative in my edits in future. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:17, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:: Oh. I am sorry. I did not realise that what you wanted was a lot of unsupported claims about liberals and feminists, as opposed to the actual reference I gave to the historical usage of the word. I will try to be more conservative in my edits in future. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:17, 23 February 2008 (EST)
::: And, by the way, if you are going to try to be cute, then at least be accurate. "They has provided" should read "they HAVE provided", and in any case, the use of "they" would not be correct since we know that TheGuy is male. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:19, 23 February 2008 (EST)
::: And, by the way, if you are going to try to be cute, then at least be accurate. "They has provided" should read "they HAVE provided", and in any case, the use of "they" would not be correct since we know that TheGuy is male. --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:19, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:::: We'd appreciate you being more conservative in your edits. It is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Yep, I guess "They have provided" would have been better, but it would have spoilt the joke, wouldn't have it (although I guess you didn't think it funny anyway)? But you are wrong on two points: First, I don't ''know'' that TheGuy is male. It is a reasonable thing to think given his name, but then there's been plenty of female authors with male pen-names, so I can't be certain. Second, I was referring to ''you'', not TheGuy! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:26, 23 February 2008 (EST)