nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: +
Warning
:::: We'd appreciate you being more conservative in your edits. It is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Yep, I guess "They have provided" would have been better, but it would have spoilt the joke, wouldn't have it (although I guess you didn't think it funny anyway)? But you are wrong on two points: First, I don't ''know'' that TheGuy is male. It is a reasonable thing to think given his name, but then there's been plenty of female authors with male pen-names, so I can't be certain. Second, I was referring to ''you'', not TheGuy! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:26, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:::: We'd appreciate you being more conservative in your edits. It is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Yep, I guess "They have provided" would have been better, but it would have spoilt the joke, wouldn't have it (although I guess you didn't think it funny anyway)? But you are wrong on two points: First, I don't ''know'' that TheGuy is male. It is a reasonable thing to think given his name, but then there's been plenty of female authors with male pen-names, so I can't be certain. Second, I was referring to ''you'', not TheGuy! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:26, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:::::: Wow! This encyclopedia whines about the change in the meaning of a word that actually ISN'T a change, as demonstrated in a number of sources that I have given, but then you say you want me to be more "conservative" in your edits, where conservative can only mean "without support, corroboration or evidence". --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:31, 23 February 2008 (EST)
:::::: Wow! This encyclopedia whines about the change in the meaning of a word that actually ISN'T a change, as demonstrated in a number of sources that I have given, but then you say you want me to be more "conservative" in your edits, where conservative can only mean "without support, corroboration or evidence". --[[User:KimSell|KimSell]] 08:31, 23 February 2008 (EST)
::::::: Whilst I have tried to discuss the issue civilly and have conceded that you make some valid points, I haven't noticed you conceding ''anything'' I've said. All you can do is criticise, it seems. Consider this a warning that if you continue in this vein you might get blocked for violation of [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandment 7]] (unproductive editing). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:38, 23 February 2008 (EST)