3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 01:36, February 24, 2008
, 01:36, February 24, 2008no edit summary
I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased
I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased
I definitely agree with Casi, and coming from sort of the same direction is that Wikipedia is trying to be a real encycopledia with true information, not true information that is edited to make it suit someones views on how that information should be represented. It is twisting the truth, and that alone makes it unreliable as a mainstream encyclopedia. With that said I am sure many people come here to get the type of 'information' that they seek. I actually think it is rather sad that an encyclopedia used to be something you could rely on, and now it is just another forum for people with a certain way of thinking who are trying their best to make sure others end up with the same belief system as them. Information has nothing to do with opinions...
to Watchman, I doubt Wikipedia intended to be 'liberal'...it is just the way it has come about. This site intends to be conservative, so I don't think the name should be changed. If the name was changed to something less suspicious it would be deceiving people, unless that is of course what you want...just because you view the information here as being accurate because it accurately expresses your opinions on a subject doesn't make it the truth. -Truce