Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + +
Talk:Liberal bias in academia (view source)
Revision as of 04:41, February 26, 2008
, 04:41, February 26, 2008→Parody: reply
:::discussion witnessed at another wiki which is not allowed to be named here. I would post you a diff, but that would not be allowed either. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 23:37, 25 February 2008 (EST)
:::discussion witnessed at another wiki which is not allowed to be named here. I would post you a diff, but that would not be allowed either. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 23:37, 25 February 2008 (EST)
::: I don't know -- or care -- whether a parodist contributed to the entry. Often the truth is ridiculed and parodied. I do know that [[liberal grading]] is a real problem and the student was not downgraded at Duke because anyone seriously thought he was a criminal. He had not even been charged with a crime. He was downgraded as a pure result of [[liberal grading]], because the student had done something [[politically incorrect]]. And that was an example I found in a mere 5 minutes on the internet. Have others here done as much research?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:41, 25 February 2008 (EST)