Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:     
Well you know, Andy I see what you mean when you say Liberal grading - and I do believe that grades on papers will occasionally be bumped up if the paper represents a view that agrees with the teacher (and let's face it - a lot of public school teachers are liberal); but at the same time, I don't think it's significant enough or frequent enough for an encyclopedia article.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 00:41, 26 February 2008 (EST)
 
Well you know, Andy I see what you mean when you say Liberal grading - and I do believe that grades on papers will occasionally be bumped up if the paper represents a view that agrees with the teacher (and let's face it - a lot of public school teachers are liberal); but at the same time, I don't think it's significant enough or frequent enough for an encyclopedia article.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 00:41, 26 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: Do you believe ''any'' of the "liberal x" articles deserve an entry? I think there's a reason why Britannica doesn't have an article on [[Liberal style]], [[Liberal denial]], [[Liberal friendship]], [[Liberal tricks]], [[Liberal obfuscation]], [[Liberal logic]], [[Liberal tools]], [[Liberal denial]], [[Liberal Myths]], [[Liberal hypocrisy]], [[Liberal hysteria]], [[Liberal celebrity obsession]] or [[Hollywood values]], and that reason isn't liberal censorship of "conservative facts" --[[User:CabbageCrate|CabbageCrate]] 05:43, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Navigation menu