Changes

Citing Moses as the author does not preclude him using older documents as sources, and a related view is that Genesis was compiled by Moses from documents that dated back to the persons whose history they describe.  In this view, Genesis 1:1 to 2:3 could have been written by God Himself (as there were no other eyewitnesses), and Genesis 2:4 to the end of chapter 4 would have been written by Adam.  These documents would have been handed down generation after generation, until coming into the possession of Moses as leader of the Israelites at his time.

Citing Moses as the author does not preclude him using older documents as sources, and a related view is that Genesis was compiled by Moses from documents that dated back to the persons whose history they describe.  In this view, Genesis 1:1 to 2:3 could have been written by God Himself (as there were no other eyewitnesses), and Genesis 2:4 to the end of chapter 4 would have been written by Adam.  These documents would have been handed down generation after generation, until coming into the possession of Moses as leader of the Israelites at his time.

In 1886 [[Julius Wellhausen]] promoted the idea that the the [[Pentateuch]] was written by a number of different but unknown authors at a later time than Moses.  This "[[Documentary Hypothesis]]", as it has become known, is widely accepted and taught by more-liberal colleges. Conservative Biblical scholars such as [[Kenneth Kitchen]] and [[Gleason Archer]] and others give various arguments on why the Documentary Hypothesis is not supported by any evidence and also ignores evidence that Moses wrote the [[Torah]]. <ref>http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/moses.html</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0404W3.htm</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/13</ref><ref>http://www.christian-thinktank.com/aec2.html</ref><ref>http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/moses.htm</ref>  <ref>http://answering-islam.org.uk/Campbell/s3c1.html</ref>  In addition, Dr. Yohanan Aharoni argues that archaeological discoveries shows that later authors or editors could not have put together or invented the [[Torah]] stories hundreds of years after they happened. <ref>http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/bible_criticism.htm</ref> [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Josh McDowell]] in his work ''New Evidence that Demands a Verdict'' discusses the development of the Documentary Hypothesis and its presuppositions, discusses various components of the Documentary hypothesis why scholars believe they are invalid, and lastly cites evidence that scholars believe argue for the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch. <ref>http://www.geocities.com/k9ocu/DH.htm</ref>

In 1886 [[Julius Wellhausen]] promoted the idea that the the [[Pentateuch]] was written by a number of different but unknown authors at a later time than Moses.  This "[[Documentary Hypothesis]]", as it has become known, is widely accepted and taught by more-liberal colleges. Conservative Biblical scholars such as [[Kenneth Kitchen]] and [[Gleason Archer]] and others give various arguments on why the Documentary Hypothesis is not supported by any evidence and also ignores evidence that Moses wrote the [[Torah]]. <ref>http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/moses.html</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0404W3.htm</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/13</ref><ref>http://www.christian-thinktank.com/aec2.html</ref><ref>http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/moses.htm</ref>  <ref>http://answering-islam.org.uk/Campbell/s3c1.html</ref>  In addition, Dr. Yohanan Aharoni argues that archaeological discoveries shows that later authors or editors could not have put together or invented the [[Torah]] stories hundreds of years after they happened. <ref>http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/bible_criticism.htm</ref> [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Josh McDowell]] in his work ''New Evidence that Demands a Verdict'' discusses the development of the Documentary Hypothesis and its presuppositions, discusses various components of the Documentary hypothesis why scholars believe they are invalid, and lastly cites evidence that scholars believe argue for the [[Mosaic authorship]] of the Pentateuch. <ref>http://www.geocities.com/k9ocu/DH.htm</ref>

According to the documentary hypothesis, the creation account is a combination of two different and inconsistent original accounts.  Supporters of the theory point to what they see as discrepancies, such as Genesis 2:19 being worded as though God created animals and birds after Adam, whereas Genesis 1 indicates that man was created after the birds and animals.  Opponents of the Documentary Hypothesis say that Genesis 2 is not intended as a chronological account, and should be read in the context of the preceding narrative, thus reading Genesis 2:19 the way that the NIV translates it:  "Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air."<ref>As well as derivatives of the NIV, the [[English Standard Version]] includes this translation in a footnote, and Darby's translation also uses this wording.</ref>

According to the documentary hypothesis, the creation account is a combination of two different and inconsistent original accounts.  Supporters of the theory point to what they see as discrepancies, such as Genesis 2:19 being worded as though God created animals and birds after Adam, whereas Genesis 1 indicates that man was created after the birds and animals.  Opponents of the Documentary Hypothesis say that Genesis 2 is not intended as a chronological account, and should be read in the context of the preceding narrative, thus reading Genesis 2:19 the way that the NIV translates it:  "Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air."<ref>As well as derivatives of the NIV, the [[English Standard Version]] includes this translation in a footnote, and Darby's translation also uses this wording.</ref>