10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + + +
Talk:Obama on rifles (view source)
Revision as of 17:07, February 28, 2008
, 17:07, February 28, 2008This is not an encyclopedia article title.
::Well what I really meant (before I was sidetracked by myself!) was that: what was so bad about Obama not doing the full hand on heart head down or singing or whatever it is that the others were doing in that picture? Perhaps it is just that he does not feel the need to express his love for America in that way? Maybe I am completely wrong but from what I've read its as good a theory as has been put forward on this thread so far. [[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 7:44 26 February 2008
::Well what I really meant (before I was sidetracked by myself!) was that: what was so bad about Obama not doing the full hand on heart head down or singing or whatever it is that the others were doing in that picture? Perhaps it is just that he does not feel the need to express his love for America in that way? Maybe I am completely wrong but from what I've read its as good a theory as has been put forward on this thread so far. [[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 7:44 26 February 2008
==Article Title==
It strikes me that this is an incredibly poor title for an encyclopedia entry - "Obama on rifles". What?!! The title is just bizarre - it's an article about a pubic figure's position on a particular issue? But not part of that person's own article, and completely divorced from it? If so, what's to stop an article called "Bush on drugs", "Rice in India", or "Cheney on statins"? So I would propose that the entire article be moved into a section on the Barack Obama article, if the topic needs to be discussed, and the section heading being made clearer. This seems like a very odd sort of encyclopedia. [[User:OldMan|OldMan]] 12:07, 28 February 2008 (EST)