Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
70 bytes added ,  21:29, March 15, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Elephants are large quadrupedal [[mammals]] native to [[Africa]] and [[India]].  The elephant is noted for its long trunk, or proboscis, a flexible nose strong enough to lift objects.
 
Elephants are large quadrupedal [[mammals]] native to [[Africa]] and [[India]].  The elephant is noted for its long trunk, or proboscis, a flexible nose strong enough to lift objects.
   −
Elephants are not mentioned directly in the [[Bible]].  They were created on the sixth day with the other beasts of the earth (Genesis 1:24-25) and survived the Flood on [[Noah's Ark]] (Genesis 7:7-8). The Apocryphal book [[1 Maccabees]] mentions thirty-two elephants sent by the Persian king Antiochus to attack [[Judas Machabeus]]. Numerous references are made to [[ivory]], a substance created from their tusks and worth great amounts.
+
Elephants are not mentioned directly in the [[Bible]].  They were created on the sixth day with the other beasts of the earth (Genesis 1:24-25) and survived the Flood on [[Noah\'s Ark]] (Genesis 7:7-8). The Apocryphal book [[1 Maccabees]] mentions thirty-two elephants sent by the Persian king Antiochus to attack [[Judas Machabeus]]. Numerous references are made to [[ivory]], a substance created from their tusks and worth great amounts.
    
In more recent times, domestic elephants have been used for riding, carrying heavy loads, and [[war|war elephants]].
 
In more recent times, domestic elephants have been used for riding, carrying heavy loads, and [[war|war elephants]].
Line 10: Line 10:     
== Support for Creationism ==
 
== Support for Creationism ==
One of the compelling pieces of evidence against evolution is that scientists cannot decide what elephants could have evolved from<ref>http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#b3</ref>. Many scientists point to the unlikely idea that elephants evolved from sea cows and water dwelling hyraxes<ref>http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#b3</ref>. The support for this point of view is that elephants might have used their trunks for snorkels.
+
One of the compelling pieces of evidence against evolution is that scientists cannot decide what elephants could have evolved from<ref>http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#b3</ref>. Many scientists point to the idea that elephants share a common ancestor with sea cows and water dwelling hyraxes<ref>http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#b3</ref><ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_sirenians</ref>. Some support for this point of view is that elephants might have used their trunks as snorkels.
    
In the past, there were many different types of elephants like [[mammoth|mammoths]] and [[mastodon|mastodons]], but most creation scientists say that these species never made it onto the ark and that these species perished with the [[dinosaurs]]{{fact}}.
 
In the past, there were many different types of elephants like [[mammoth|mammoths]] and [[mastodon|mastodons]], but most creation scientists say that these species never made it onto the ark and that these species perished with the [[dinosaurs]]{{fact}}.
18

edits

Navigation menu