Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
367 bytes added ,  00:40, March 2, 2008
Update
Line 126: Line 126:     
Perhaps, but its not really my call. I couldn't help but look up the entries for America, Australia and England and theres nothing like that in those articles. I'm just wondering why Scotland has deserved such unfair treatment. Yes, obviously there are homosexuals in Scotland, like everywhere else, but the paragraph I deleted was grotesquely unjust and made Scotland seem like San Francisco gone mad (but with more rain). If the paragraph is to stay then similar entries for every nation in the western world detailing [[gay liberation]] should be submitted. Remember, Scotland is only following a lead that started in the United States.--[[User:ScotsPatriot|ScotsPatriot]] 15:36, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Perhaps, but its not really my call. I couldn't help but look up the entries for America, Australia and England and theres nothing like that in those articles. I'm just wondering why Scotland has deserved such unfair treatment. Yes, obviously there are homosexuals in Scotland, like everywhere else, but the paragraph I deleted was grotesquely unjust and made Scotland seem like San Francisco gone mad (but with more rain). If the paragraph is to stay then similar entries for every nation in the western world detailing [[gay liberation]] should be submitted. Remember, Scotland is only following a lead that started in the United States.--[[User:ScotsPatriot|ScotsPatriot]] 15:36, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Update ==
 +
 +
 +
I see there is a difference of opinion in what information is appropriate for the article, but there hasn't been a complaint in this section.  Is the new information about Scotish migration trends from the 1800's to the 1890's wrong?  If not, why is it inappropiate to mention?  Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 19:40, 1 March 2008 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu