Changes

:::And, I changed your wording because it wasn't neutral ~ it presumed that the creationists were right without citation, so I pulled the inference.  Maybe it'd be better to just remove the reference to who's right or wrong completely?-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]]

:::And, I changed your wording because it wasn't neutral ~ it presumed that the creationists were right without citation, so I pulled the inference.  Maybe it'd be better to just remove the reference to who's right or wrong completely?-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]]

:::: Thanks for the clarification on "negligent".  Sometimes the facts favour one side over the other, so won't be "neutral".  Your substituted sentence is not neutral either, as it effectively says that the quotes ''are'' fallacious.  I think that I could agree with taking the footnote out completely.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:13, 4 March 2008 (EST)

:::: Thanks for the clarification on "negligent".  Sometimes the facts favour one side over the other, so won't be "neutral".  Your substituted sentence is not neutral either, as it effectively says that the quotes ''are'' fallacious.  I think that I could agree with taking the footnote out completely.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:13, 4 March 2008 (EST)

:::::Very fair!  I've removed it so you can inspect it.  I appreciate your civility.  I hope I've made the distinction clear.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 00:16, 4 March 2008 (EST)

:::::Very fair!  I've removed it so you can inspect it.  I appreciate your civility.  I hope I've made the distinction quoting and quote-mining clear.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 00:16, 4 March 2008 (EST)